Development of Covid-19 Disaster Risk Instruments for Children

Hery Sumasto

Abstract

Background. Children need to get protection during the Covid-19 pandemic, in accordance with Presidential Regulation 12/2020 on The Determination of Non-Natural Disasters. The purpose of the research is to develop non-natural disaster risk instruments for children. Research methods. This type of research is Research and Development. Instrument development is carried out in 5 (five) stages, namely: 1) evaluation of instruments; 2) development; 3) experiment; 4) socialization; 5) recommendations. FGD population of 40 respondents is target-1 as many as 20 people, target-2 as much as 20. Experts in this research are methodology experts and child disaster experts. Research Result: Phase I disaster risk, namely threat, vulnerability and capacity, obtained 7 standard components of disaster instruments for children: 1) economic status; 2) knowledge; 3) attitude; 4) infrastructure; 5) institutional organization; 6) threat level; 7) disaster risk reduction behavior. Validity and reliability tests show that of the 32 valid items, 25 items are all reliable because the Cronbach alpha value is above 0.7. Not valid for 7 items. Phase 2: instrument testing was conducted on 267 respondents. Test with google form. The test results of instruments for children potentially exposed to Covid-19 amounted to 69% who were not exposed to 31%. Of those 69%, strong exposure is 2%, high exposure is 15% and medium exposure is 83%. Conclusion: There are 32 question points on non-natural disaster risk instruments, developed from 7 disaster risk variables for children. The instrument has good functionality in terms of efficiency, functionality and usability. Output: 1) disaster risk instruments for children; 2) intellectual property rights; 3) international journal publications 4) monograph books.

Keywords: Instruments, Non-Natural Disaster Risk, Children

Full Text:

PDF

References

Dinie Ratri Destiningrum. Psikologi anak berkebutuhan khusus. Pertama. Yogyakarta: psikosain; 2016.

Hery Sumasto, N.Surtinah NTW. Development Of Instrumens To Detect Disaster Risk In Children Under Five. Res Artic URL this Artic http//heanoti.com/index.php/hn/article. 2018;3(3).

Nahdatul Ulama LPBI. Penyusunan Peta Kerentanan Terhadap Bencana. Yogjakarta: Humanitarian Open Street Map Team; 2017.

Chandra RK, Supriharjo RD. Mitigasi Bencana Banjir Rob di Jakarta Utara. J Tek Pomits. 2013;2(1):25–30.

Hery Sumasto, Nurwening Tyas Wisnu NS. Development of Instrumens to Detect Disaster Risk in Children Under Five. Humanist Netw Sci Technol [Internet]. 2018;2(2). Available from: http://heanoti.com/index.php/hnhttp://heanoti.com/index.php/hn/article/view/hn20225

Ana Nadhya Abrar. Memberdayakan Masyarakat Lewat Penyiaran Berita Bencana Alam. J ugm [Internet]. 2016;11(3). Available from: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/10993

Heru Santoso Wahito Nugroho. Difficultness-Usefulness Pyramid (DUP) as New Method to Select Elements Prioritized in Management of e-Learning in Health. 2017;

Hidayati D, Widayatun, Hartana P, Triyono, Kusumawati T. Panduan Mengukur Tingkat Kesiapsiagaan Masyarakat dan Komunitas Sekolah. 2017;(January 2011).

Hidhayah Nur Damayant. Kajian Kesiapsiagaan Individu Dan Rumah Tangga Dalam Menghadapi Bencana Tsunami Di Kecamatan Grabag Kabupaten Purworejo. Universitas Negeri Semarang. 2015.

Sumasto HNTW, Surtinah N. Development Of Instrumens To Detect Disaster Risk In Children Under Five. Heal Notions [Internet]. 2018;2(2):279–83. Available from: URL of this article: http://heanoti.com/index.php/hn/article/view/hn20225

Imam Sufriandi Fatra,Pemetaan Risiko Bencana di Kampus I Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta Dwi Astuti MA. Pemetaan Risiko Bencana di Kampus I Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Naskah Publ Prodi Kesmas FIK UMS. 2015;

Ati Astuti. Pelaksanaan Program Sekolah Siaga Bencana di SMA Negeri 1 Karanganom Klaten. 2015.

Dhuha Ginanjar D. Analisis Penentuan Zonasi Resiko Bencana Tanah Longsor Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis (Studi Kasus : Kabupaten Banjarnegara). J Geod [Internet]. 2016;5(1):326–35. Available from: https://docplayer.info/63183996-Jurnal-geodesi-undip-januari-2016.html

Kusumawati W. Bencana Alam Dan Pendidikan Interprofesi. Pharmaciana. 2015;5(1):93.

Asyhari A, Fisika P, Lampung B, Lampung B, Budaya A, Asesmen I, et al. Pengembangan instrumen asesmen literasi sains berbasis nilai-nilai islam dan budaya indonesia dengan pendekatan kontekstual. LENTERA Pendidik [Internet]. 2019;22(1):166–79. Available from: http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/lentera_pendidikan/article/view/6437

Devi Riskianingrum. Penanganan Bencana dan Transformasi Pengetahuan Tentang Kegempaan Di Masa Kolonial. Paramita. 2013;23(1):1–13.

Absor MU. Penanganan Anak Dalam Masa Tanggap Darurat Bencana Alam: Tinjauan Konvensi Hak Anak dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak. J Dakwah. 2011;Vol. XI, N(1):17–32.

BNPB. Panduan Penilaian Kapasitas Daerah Dalam Penanggulangan Bencana. BNPB; 2012. 42 p.

Sumasto H, Wisnu NT, Surtinah N. Development of Instrumens to Detect Disaster Risk in Children Under Five Hery. Heal Notions. 2018;2(2):279–83.

Nugroho HSW. Quality of health service according to consumer perception (Kualitas layanan kesehatan menurut persepsi konsumen. 1st ed. Sunarto, editor. Magetan: Forum Ilmiah Kesehatan (FORIKES); 2011.

Kana Hayati EL. Pengembangan Instrumen Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa. J Penelit dan Eval Pendidik. 2010;14(1):84–99.

Kurnia Fitriningsih. Hubungan Tingkat Pendidikan formal dengan Kesiapsiagaan dalam Menghadapi Bencana Gempa Bumi Masyarakat Desa Jabung Kecamatan Gantiwarno Kab Klaten. In: Fitriningtiyas K, editor. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta [Internet]. Surakarta; 2014. p. xvii. Available from: http://eprints.ums.ac.id/30020/1/03_DEPAN.pdf

Wisnu Martha Adiputra. Literasi Media dan Interpretasi atas Bencana.pdf. J Ilmu Sos dan Ilmu Polit. 2008;11(3):287–414.

Pramono Suharmiati MSS. Upaya Peningkatan Kesehatan Ibu Dan Anak Melalui Pengorganisasian Sistem Siaga Berbasis Masyarakat Di Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara (Studi Di Desa Noeltoko Dan Noepesu, Kecamatan Miomaffo Barat). Bul Penelit Sist Kesehat [Internet]. 2013;16(1). Available from: http://ejournal.litbang.depkes.go.id/index.php/hsr/article/view/3144

Djaiman & Sri PH. Besarnya peluang usia penyapihan anak baduta di Indonesia dan faktor yang mempengaruhinya. 2009;19(1):1–8.

article mother and baby. cegah tujuh bencana yang sering terjadi pada anak. In: Indonesia Mother & Baby [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://www.motherandbaby.co.id/article/2017/3/12/7690/Cegah-7-Kecelakaan-yang-Sering-Dialami-Anak

Muhammad Zulfikar Syuaib. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Simulasi Vs Bermain Peran dan Sikap Siswa terhadap Pengetahuan dan Kesiapsiagaan tentang Bencana Alam. Teknol Pembelajaran UN Malang. 2013;1(2):177–89.

Efendi F, Chen C-M, Nursalam N, Andriyani NWF, Kurniati A, Nancarrow SA. How to attract health students to remote areas in Indonesia: a discrete choice experiment. Int J Health Plann Manage [Internet]. 2016;31(4):430–45. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84930079106&doi=10.1002%2fhpm.2289&partnerID=40&md5=f768e9970b4eb42ff3b65ba4ce860581

Nursalam N, Octavia M, Tristiana RD, Efendi F. Association between insomnia and social network site use in Indonesian adolescents. Nurs Forum [Internet]. 2019;54(2):149–56. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85058061226&doi=10.1111%2fnuf.12308&partnerID=40&md5=8b1c9c2622952d342b6eaa088f552a3b

Primasari NA, Nursalam N, Efendi F. Factors associated with knowledge, attitude and behavior of condom use among women living with HIV aids. Indian J Public Heal Res Dev [Internet]. 2019;10(10):1870–3.

Unicef. Pengurangan Risiko Perlindungan Anak saat COVID-19. 2020;

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share